Who is Xrayzr? (pronounced eks-RAY'-zer) Fresh revelations about Xrayzr are being presented in ways that will expand your imagination. Continue returning to see what's new, and you will gradually learn many answers to the question—who is Xrayzr?

What's Happening?

The Bible does NOT teach that

“life begins at conception”

It teaches that “Life begins at birth”

GENESIS 2:7

2:7 And the Lord God formed [a prototypical] man of the “dust” [reddish-brown “pottery” clay] of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the “breath of life”— and man became a living soul. [the symbolic, yet real clay prototype model of Adam was instantaneously replaced by the pre-designed human body of Adam, causing him to be “born of Mother Earth”]

The scriptures are clear from “the Beginning” that GOD considers a human a “living soul” only when the human is born and begins breathing— not before. A human must be literally born physically a first time before he or she can be “born again” as an immortal spirit being.

JOHN 3:5-8

3:5 “Jesus” [YAHshua] answered, Truly, truly, I say unto you, Except a man be born of “water” [representing amniotic fluid] and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of GOD [the Government of GOD].

3:6 That which is born of the flesh is [physical, mortal] flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is [supernatural, immortal] spirit.

3:7 Marvel not that I said unto you, You must be “born” again.

3:8 The wind blows where it decides, and you hear the sound thereof, but can not tell from where it comes, and where it goes. So is every one that is “born” of the Spirit. [YAHshua is the only human in history who has been literally “born again” of GOD’s Spirit— by his own definition. As typified in normal physical human birth, YAHshua is the “Head” of his “Body” of believers throughout human history, who will be “born again” as he was, at the “First Resurrection” when he returns]

JAMES 2:26

2:26 For as the body without the spirit is dead. So faith without works is dead also.

The body of an unborn human baby, at any stage of development, is not yet considered to be a “living soul”, as symbolized by Adam’s “birth” from “Mother Earth”— and Eve’s “birth” from Adam’s body. Only at birth is each human given the spirit component (the “spirit of man”) that provides the capability of having a human “mind”.

Among other things, it also includes a personal spirit “matrix” that provides a “customized” instinctive framework for developing a personality that will congruously “match” each human’s physical appearance throughout its life— under normal conditions.

1 CORINTHIANS 2:9-14

2:9 But as it is written, Eye has not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the “heart” [emotional mind] of man, the things which GOD has prepared for them that love Him.

2:10 But GOD has revealed them unto us by His Spirit; for the Spirit searches all things, yes, the deep things of GOD.

2:11 For what man knows the things of a man, save [by] the “spirit of man” which is in him? Even so, the things of GOD knows no man, but [by] the Spirit of GOD.

2:12 Now we have received, not the spirit [“mind”] of the World, but the spirit [“mind”] which is of GOD; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of GOD.

2:13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teaches, but which the Holy Spirit [GOD’s central Mind] teaches; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.

2:14 But the natural man receives not the things of the Spirit of GOD; for they are foolishness unto him. Neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. [But that can be reversed by GOD, if one is willing.]

ECCLESIASTES 12:7-14

12:7 Then shall the “dust” [body’s atomic elements] return to the earth [ground, or soil] as it was; and the spirit [of man— symbolized by one’s last breath, or expiration] shall return unto GOD who gave it [at birth— symbolized by one’s first breath, or inspiration].

12:8 Vanity of vanities, says the preacher; all is vanity [much of life can seem like it’s not worth the effort]

12:9 And moreover, because the preacher [King Solomon] was wise, he still taught the people knowledge. Yes, he gave good heed, and sought out, and set in order many proverbs.

12:10 The preacher sought to find out acceptable words; and that which was written was upright, even words of truth.

12:11 The words of the wise are as goads, and as nails fastened by the masters of assemblies, which are given from one shepherd.

12:12 And further, by these, my son, be admonished: of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh.

12:13 Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear GOD, and keep His Commandments; for this is the whole duty of man.

12:14 For GOD shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.

1 TIMOTHY 2:3-6

2:3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of GOD our Savior;

2:4 Who will have ALL “men” [humans] to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.

2:5 For there is one GOD [the Father], and one mediator between GOD and men, the man Christ “Jesus” [YAHshua];

2:6 Who gave himself— a redemption for all— to be testified in due time.

SOME "CHRISTIAN BELIEVERS" ACT LIKE DEVILS

— BECAUSE THEY ARE

If a person chooses to reject belief in all “gods” he has heard about, there may be good reasons for doing so. The person probably hasn’t heard anything that is reasonable about GOD; or what he has heard was an irrational mischaracterization of GOD — often acquired from “believers” who believe in irrational mischaracterizations of GOD.

But some who claim to be “atheists” go far beyond rejection of the validity of “gods” and religions that make no sense to them. Refusing to consider the possibility of the existence of “gods” one has never heard of is as irrational as refusing to consider the possibility of the existence of all humans one has never heard of, based only on ignorant animosity toward the few one has heard about.

Why should an atheist care if most of the World’s population has “faith”, or belief that some form of “God” exists and expects them to live decent and moral lives? It is each person’s BEHAVIOR that determines each person’s value in the World, and his value to GOD — not the validity of what the person believes about his “God” — or the reputation of his “Religion”. Even if a person who was a “believer” in some religion foolishly chooses to become a “faithless, atheistic disbeliever”, it will still be his BEHAVIOR that determines his value in the World —  and whether or not he will accrue any value for GOD to save.

When “faith” is defined as belief in one GOD, it does not follow that the “believer” has achieved all that GOD expects from the person who “believes in” Him. In fact, YAHshua’s half-brother James wrote that devils also believe in GOD — because they have experienced life in the non-physical supernatural realm.

JAMES 2:17-20

2:17 Even so faith, if it has not “works” [good behavior], is dead, being alone.

2:18 Yes, a man may say, he has faith [alone], and I have [only] works. Show me your “faith” without your works, and I will show you my faith by my [good] works [which does not include useless ritualistic religiosity].

2:19 You believe that there is one God; you do well. The devils also believe, and tremble.

2:20  But will you know, O vain man, that faith without [good] works is dead?

LUKE 4:33-35, 41

4:33 And in the synagogue there was a man, which had a spirit of an unclean devil, and cried out with a loud voice,

4:34 Saying, Let us alone; what have we to do with you, you Jesus of Nazareth? Are you come to destroy us? I know who you are; the Holy One of God.

4:35 And Jesus rebuked him, saying, Hold your peace, and come out of him. And when the devil had thrown him in the midst, he came out of him, and hurt him not.

4:41 And devils also came out of many, crying out, and saying, You are Christ, the Son of GOD. And he rebuking them suffered them not to speak; for they knew that he was Christ.

LUKE 8:26-30

8:26 And they arrived at the country of the Gadarenes, which is opposite to Galilee.

8:27 And when he went forth to land, there met him out of the city a certain man, which had devils a long time, and wore no clothes, neither abode in any house, but in the tombs.

8:28 When he saw Jesus, he cried out, and fell down before him, and with a loud voice said, What have I to do with you, Jesus, you Son of GOD Most High? I plead to you, torment me not.

8:29 (For he had commanded the unclean spirit to come out of the man. For oftentimes it had caught him; and he was kept bound with chains and in fetters; and he broke the bands, and was driven of the devil [demon] into the wilderness.)

8:30 And Jesus asked him, saying, What is your name? And he said, Legion: because many devils were entered into him.

MATTHEW 8:28-29

8:28 And when he was come to the other side into the country of the Gergesenes, there met him two possessed with devils, coming out of the tombs, exceeding fierce, so that no man might pass by that way.

8:29 And, behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with you, Jesus, you Son of GOD? Are you come here to torment us before the time?

ACTS 16:16-20

16:16 And it came to pass, as we went to prayer, a certain damsel possessed with a spirit of divination met us, which brought her masters much gain by soothsaying.

16:17 The same followed Paul and us, and cried, saying, These men are the servants of the Most High GOD, which show unto us the way of salvation.

16:18 And this did she many days. But Paul, being grieved, turned and said to the spirit, I command you in the name of Jesus Christ to come out of her. And he came out the same hour.

16:19 And when her masters saw that the hope of their gains was gone, they caught Paul and Silas, and drew them into the marketplace unto the rulers,

16:20 And brought them to the magistrates, saying, These men, being Jews, do exceedingly trouble our city,

A human is NOT a “faithful believer”, or a “Christian” simply because he says he has faith in GOD and believes that “Jesus” is the Christ and the Son of GOD. Some “Christians” have acted no better than disruptive “free-thinking” devils (angels who became alienated from GOD, in the distant pre-human past). Some “Christians” imagine GOD is their friend — but their closest “spirit friend” may actually be a devil pretending to be God while ruining the reputation deserved by the only true GOD.

MATTHEW 7:15-23

7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.

7:16 You shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

7:17 Even so every good tree brings forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree brings forth “evil” fruit.

7:18 A good tree cannot bring forth “evil” fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

7:19 Every tree that brings not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

7:20 Wherefore by their “fruits” you shall know them.

7:21 Not every one that says unto me [YAHshua, the Messiah], Lord, Lord, shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven [which will begin to be established on Earth at the time that this general, non-personalized Judgement is occurring, which is NOT the Final personalized Judgement]; but he that does the will of my Father which is in Heaven.

7:22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we [Christians] not prophesied in your name? and in your name have [pretended to] cast out devils? and in your name done many wonderful [religious] works?

7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you. Depart from me, all of you that work iniquity.

A year ago, I had plans for what I hoped you would be able to see on the Xrayzr Revelations website throughout last year. But my two latest books, Tying the Knot, and Hidden Passages finally became available on Amazon.com and I decided to try to use Twitter as a means of publicizing the books. Please check @ArmonRaE and @XrayzrRev to see the considerable amount of new, graphically provocative material that I have generated over the last year.

That diversion has become my favorite form of entertainment. Twitter is a phenomenal form of instantaneous, interactive access to any category of human interest imaginable. Though most “Tweeters” still don’t seem to realize they aren’t limited to 140 “letter characters” of cryptic word abbreviations, “lol’s”, and “happy-face emoticons”, a few have learned to catch the attention of thousands of real “followers” who actually read posted “Tweets” that have potential value to them— or an eye-catching image to look at for a couple of seconds.

I have several incomplete writing projects that have been delayed because I’ve been having too much fun ridiculing the hollow, godless belief system of atheistic anti-religionists who apparently have nothing that causes them to feel they have any worth other than “crusading” for the abolition of all religions in the World.

Believing they understand all of the World’s theologies, and believing that all of the World’s theologies are evil through and through, and that everyone who believes any of the World’s theologies is stupid and immoral, they try to attract attention to themselves, on Twitter at least, by picking, pasting, and posting old, non-sensical, illogical, and often profane and sacrilegious “memes” that are graphic images with some sort of foul “message” added— often unintelligible or incomprehensible.

The worthless “twitterizations” posted by some anonymous, neo-atheistic anti-religionists very often consist of several “character consuming” @addresses; irrelevant concocted #hashtag categories no one looks at; leaving what’s left of 140 character spaces to be filled with empty space, profanity, hate-speech, or absurdly illogical fallacies.

If you don’t yet have a free Twitter account so you can see what others post on their live Twitter pages in any category imaginable, it’s worth paying nothing to open an account. You’re not obligated to ever post anything on your own page, but you’ll have access to the Twitter pages of others in a manner that can’t be duplicated by any of the “third-party” Twitter apps, or applications, that reconfigure information and images from live feeds in ways that can be misleading.

I may be attempting to break away from daily use of Twitter so I can give more attention to my next book, Which Came First?— the Dinosaur, or the Egg? I thought it was mostly written several months ago, but I now have vastly more “material” that has been produced for my @ArmonRaE and @XrayzrRev Twitter pages.

The subject matter of that book will cover a broad range of subjects often mentioned, if not discussed, by anti-religionists who insist that they are literally “great apes”, and are proud of it. They seem to find some perverse satisfaction in their belligerent belief that they are the product of NOTHING, and will return to NOTHING with no hope of any continuing existence provided by any “god”.

That would be fine if they left it at that and were simply atheistic. But too many have devoted themselves to the notion that they can anonymously destroy every form of religion on Earth. Little do they know that the “religions” they think need to be destroyed have never existed, except in the twisted form concocted within their own “minds”. They are essentially fighting imaginary religious demons— instead of the religious demons that are real.

Announcing the publication of two new books —

now available on Amazon.com

Please visit my Twitter page @ArmonRaE for information.

The following material has been prepared for book descriptions associated with the publication of my next two books. They are now available on Amazon.com.

The “author bio” is very revealing—not about the details of my life (which I could probably fit on a “postcard”, with room to spare) but as an insight into my opinion of “overly educated” and “underly knowledgeable” individuals; especially “credentialed theologians” who think they are contributing something worth reading in their “door-stop” books, and brain-clogging expositions of what they think they understand about theology better than anyone else.

Are my Presentations any better? Keep reading Xrayzr Revelations for the answer.

If you can believe in Myth Math — all things are possible — except for the existence and power of GOD

Multi-verses derived from the Atheist Babble

CLOWN CAR FIZZIX

A lampoon of DEGRASSE TYSON’s on-the-record beliefs about “black holes” from the Cosmos cartoon show, episode four:

“Used clown car salesman” DEGRASSE TYSON sells Magic Carpet Math Myths that make “the Bible” look more and more reasonable after every episode.

     If you could survive the trip in a clown car, you might emerge in another place and time in our own universe, circumventing, or dodging the first commandment of relativity: thou shalt not travel faster than light in a clown car. And if you can circumvent the first commandment of relativity—why not all of them?

     Nothing can move through space faster than light, unless you are playing fizzix dodge law. But space is not mere emptiness if there is something in it. Its properties can stretch and shrink and be deformed—just like the ever-evolving theories concocted by the scoff-laws of “relativity”. And when that happens, time is deformed, too. Fun flies when you’re doing time.

     Einstein discovered that space and time are just two aspects of the same thing: space-time. Space-time itself can deform enough to carry you anywhere at any speed—although you would never “get anywhere” because everything else would have distanced itself from you “at any speed” because of self-inflating space. Nevertheless, clown cars may very well be tunnels through the universe.

     On this intergalactic clown subway car system, you could travel to the farthest reaches of space-time, or you might arrive in someplace even more amazing. We might find ourselves in a clown car parking lot in an altogether different universe.

     But how can a whole universe fit inside of a clown car, which is only a small part of our universe? It’s another magic circus trick of clown car fizzix. The phenomenal gravity of a clown car can warp the space of the entire universe inside it. Our local gravity might be a drag to us, but it’s really feeble compared with what goes on inside a clown car.

     As far as we know, when a giant star collapses to make a clown car, the extreme density and pressure at the center mimic the Big Bang, which gave rise to our universe. And a universe inside a clown car might give rise to its own clown cars. And those could lead to other universes. Maybe that’s how our cosmos clown cartoon show came to be. For all we know, if you want to see what it’s like inside a clown car just look around you.

http://www.caranddriver.com/features/the-physics-of-clown-cars-feature

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

Recent quotes from Stanford physicist Andrei Linde — originator of "eternal chaotic inflation" . . .
 

"I was living in this state of depression. I was in my bed and unable to do anything,"

"I held my head ... What can I do? What can I do?"

"And suddenly, I had the theory of eternally expanding inflationary universes, unceasingly producing new universes,"

"It was just pure, from nowhere,"

"Even if one tries to interpret our results in religious terms, I think that it would be such a waste of energy for 'God' not to use this way of creating a universe -- to take a milligram of matter and then the universe does the rest of the job by itself, producing infinite number of universes,"

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

You may think it’s ridiculous to claim that it is easier for a huge camel to pass through the tiny eye of a needle, than for a GOD-less, wealth-hoarding man to enter into the Kingdom of GOD—especially if you believe that only the camel, the needle, and the man in the equation can exist.

Perhaps it would have been more believable to some if Jesus said . . .

It is easier for “Nothing” to spontaneously pack into a previously non-existent particle of “space-time”, smaller than a single atomic proton, the entirety of all energy, all matter, all dark energy, all dark matter, and all annihilated anti-matter which has ever existed in the Universe, and let it “instantly” “inflate” into self-generated “space-time” out to at least 13.8 billion light-years away from the current Earth location, in every direction—than for an atheistic cosmologist to enter into the Kingdom of GOD.

Please read Myth Math

According to 1&1 Web Hosting Site Analytics — since the beginning of 2013, and through 2015, Xrayzr Revelations has been viewed and read by visitors from the following countries:

Argentina,  Armenia,  Australia,  Austria,  Bahamas,  Belarus,  Belgium,  Bosnia and Herzegovina,  Brazil,  Bulgaria,  Canada,  Chile,  China,  Columbia,  Costa Rica,  Cyprus,  Czech Republic,  Denmark,  Ecuador,  Egypt,  El Salvador,  Estonia,  Ethiopia,  Finland,  France,  Germany,  Ghana,  Greece,  Hong Kong,  India,  Indonesia,  Ireland,  Israel,  Italy,  Japan,  Kazakhstan,  Latvia,  Lithuania,  Luxembourg,  Malaysia,  Mexico,  Moldova,  Morocco,  Netherlands,  New Zealand,  Nigeria,  Norway,  Pakistan,  Peru,  Philippines,  Poland,  Portugal,  Romania,  Russia,  Saudi Arabia,  Serbia,  Singapore,  South Africa,  South Korea,  Spain,  Sweden,  Switzerland,  Taiwan,  Thailand,  Turkey,  Ukraine,  United Kingdom,  Venezuela,  Vietnam,  Zambia,

  and the United States

Thank you for your interest, and please continue to return. We’ve only just begun.

I’ve only just begun “Tweeting”, and I’ve been amusing myself by trying to “engage” an assortment of “non-kindred spirits” who seem to acquire their opinions from places I would never stick my head. I began by provoking a few pro-gun advocates who believe they are able to stop any anti-gun adversary with a single round of what I call “Gunslinger Lingo”— the “language of arsenalists”. You can read some of the “exchanges” of “word-fire” below.

#GunslingerLingo is false bravado and implied threats in the form of pugnacious bloviation based on imagined ability to stop "attackers" with bullets. Fortunately, those who parrot the worn-out clichés of “gunslinger lingo” are mostly harmless, because most will never experience an opportunity to “valiantly” shoot an “attacker” between the eyes with their deadly weapons.

Lately, I've been focusing my "serious satire", or sarcasm on atheists. True atheists simply don't believe in "gods", or any form of supernatural Creator. So-called "New" atheists adamantly reject the possibility of the existence of any "gods". Many atheists who think they know something (or everything) about religion, seem to be on "anti-theist crusades" devoted to the eradication of the phony, ridiculous "straw-religions" they have set up to be easy targets for their blithering blather.

And most Twitterers don’t bother actually following many on their “Following” lists, or even know who’s on it. Much "Following" is done only in hope of a reciprocal "follow-back". Most users of Twitter are probably aware that Twitter is primarily a place to see your own words in print so you can impress yourself with your own “brilliance”.

Check my Twitter pages @ArmonRaE   @XrayzrRev

You might see something worth following.

Word-Fire

Since I don’t want to add another BLOG (bloviation bog) to the Internet “blog-jam”, I opened a Twitter page— @ArmonRaE —as a way to advertise my two new books, TYING the KNOT, and Hidden Passages. Since it is still relatively new, I currently have few “Followers”. But that doesn’t matter because most Twitter “followers” never actually follow anyone but themselves; even if they’ve clicked on thousands of “Follow” buttons hoping to get “followed” in return.

Keep in mind that Jesus had relatively few true followers who believed him after two and a half years of full-time ministry, which included the GOD-given power to attract followers with miracles that validated his authority to present new revelations.

Even Jesus’ own brothers and sisters thought he had gone crazy and tried to have him “put away” early in his ministry. They finally changed their minds.

Most people don’t want to have their personal accumulation of “beliefs” questioned. It’s easier to talk only to people who believe what you believe so you can enjoy the imagined superiority of your own unquestioned opinions. “Birds of a feather flock together” because they feel safe and secure “tweeting” the same “song” as everyone they know—without contradiction.

There’s usually nothing wrong with wanting to be around individuals of “like mind”. Enjoy any sense of “intellectual superiority” it provides. But you’ll never know for sure if your beliefs are intellectually superior if you never compare them to different view-points.

Regrettably, many who think they’ve compared their own beliefs on an issue with those who think differently, have only read “straw man” misrepresentations of what would supposedly be argued by someone who believes differently. Only when an individual has a live interchange of ideas with a person who thinks differently can he test the strength and validity of his own beliefs.

Such live interchanges of opposing opinion don’t have to be face-to-face, and it’s best if they aren’t. Especially if one is arguing “gun-control” with a person who believes that the use of deadly guns is appropriate for determining the outcome of a confrontation. How many husbands, and wives, have heard their spouse say, “I’m so mad at you, if I had a gun, I’d kill you.

Twitter offers advantages for those who enjoy arguing about what they believe with others who don’t. The 140 character text limit encourages “long-winded” writers such as myself to limit a response to the equivalent of a comedian’s “one liner”. And many philosophers have become well-known for philosophical “one liners” that are valuable bits of wisdom. King Solomon is an example.

But don’t expect to see much wisdom in Twitter exchanges. As I put it . . .

Can a “long-winded” author of theology become “short-winded” writing “tweets” that aren’t just a “passing of wind” like most of them?

Follow @ArmonRaE and find out.

To any of you who wonder how I might respond, or retort, if you were to challenge me with a viewpoint contrary to my own, I hereby provide a compilation of a little “word battle” I enjoyed with a few gun advocates who take themselves, and their imagined assailants too seriously.

My form of retorting is usually somewhat snarky and sarcastic—a style I call “serious satire” when applied to my Presentations on the Xrayzr Revelations website. Don’t take my comments too seriously. I don’t.

My “tweets” are green. What color would yours be?

Unfriendly Word-Fire

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

Allow me to define a word used in the constitution for the gun grabbers. Maybe you don't understand infringe, try...

It's gun hoarders who are "grabbing" all of the guns. A right to bear arms only applied to those in well regulated State militias.

Take a history lesson, my friend. We, the people, ARE the militia.

Does that mean all children, criminals, and politicians you fear will take your guns, have a right to accumulate arsenals?

Do we fear children? No, we protect them from criminals who will NOT obey any of your laws which are focused on the tool.

Do you fear childish adults who can't be trusted with guns? Aren't you mainly concerned about protecting your arsenal of "tools"?

you're absolutely right. I don't trust some adults with guns, but without mine, my children and I are defenseless

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

No better way to say I love you than by giving them the gift of defense. Arm your loved one with a chance to win a...

How do you million moms protect your children from all of the flying bullets during your panic-driven shoot-outs with intruders?

And what would you rather we do, urinate on ourselves? Hide in a closet until police arrived? Pray that a good guy gets there

You might do that anyway while you’re frantically unloading your gun toward the bad guy. Hiding is one of “natures” best defenses.

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

No better way to say I love you than by giving them the gift of defense. Arm your loved one with a chance to win a...

How do you million moms protect your children from all of the flying bullets during your panic-driven shoot-outs with intruders?

simple. We train, our bodies and our minds, and don't allow ourselves to panic. We're responsibly armed citizens, not criminals.

Are you serious? How many of you million moms have ever had that nonsense tested in a real situation? Trained police officers panic.

If they panic, should they give up their guns then? maybe hide in a closet?

Do you really think you should "protect" your SELF by unloading your gun while disregarding innocent bystanders?

oh come on, you're just being ridiculous.

Thank you. I'll take that as a compliment.

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

How do you million moms protect your children from all of the flying bullets during your panic-driven shoot-outs with intruders?

in a life/death situation, the only laws that can save you are the laws of physics.

Aren’t the “laws of physics” also threatening to kill YOU—if you’re referring to the mechanics of “shooting to kill”?

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

How do you million moms protect your children from all of the flying bullets during your panic-driven shoot-outs with intruders?

Silly goose, if you’ve trained properly panic isn’t a factor in the equation only those that fear guns panic around them.

Hope you never have to learn how silly that theory is. Ask some “trained” officers who have gone crazy in “gun battles”.

difference is officers don’t spend half as much time at range as private citizens do.

Are there a lot of gun-toting criminals threatening people at the range?

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

how do u get proficient at something without practice. People practice so they r better prepared under stress

Practicing non-threatening imaginary scenarios doesn’t ensure you can handle a really dangerous situation.

u can also train under simulated high stress scenarios.

How stressed do you get under such simulated scenarios? Imagine how stressed you’ll be in a real situation.

in an actual shooting situation armed citizens have 80% accuracy rate, police only 20%. Training counts

I don’t think your statistic accounts for unreported inaccurate firing. Are police completely untrained?

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

is it the gun you have a problem with, or the mom part, which is it?

I have a problem with the proliferation of guns fueled by the paranoia of those who imagine imminent threats.

don’t like them, don’t get one.

That won’t keep others from getting them and spreading the propaganda that deadly weapons create safety.

You still haven’t answered the question, what should we do? waiting…

What should you do? Your answer is—buy more guns! How many can you use at one time? How many make you feel safe?

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

How do you million moms protect your children from all of the flying bullets during your panic-driven shoot-outs with intruders?

with a gun, and in time? When seconds count, police are minutes away.

Your gun protects them from bullets flying out of your gun??? What protects them from bullets flying out of the bad guy's gun?

our members engage in live situational training. We've answered your questions, now try answering ours. What do YOU suggest we do

How does situational training simulate the panic you will have in a real situation?

how do u get proficient at something without practice. People practice so they r better prepared under stress

Practicing non-threatening imaginary scenarios doesn't ensure you can handle a really dangerous situation.

if u practice enough u build muscle memory so that your body responds as it's been trained.

Are you depending on "muscle memory" to save you. Consider training the "muscle" between your ears.

do u think u could comment without being insulting. I didn't insult your intelligence don't insult mine.

Do alternate viewpoints "insult" your intelligence? Maybe you've never seen any before.

Ignoring the criminal exists doesn't make you morally/intellectually superior or more capable either.

I don't ignore the existence of real criminals; but I don't let imagined criminals control my life.

neither do we. If you acknowledge existence how can you fault a mother for being prepared to defend herself?

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

Your gun protects them from bullets flying out your gun??? What protects them from bullets flying out of the bad guy’s gun?

oh come on this one is easy! My bullets hitting him first is what protects me from the boogeyman

It’s easy to “shoot” imaginary boogey-men that are only in your head; but many gun owners shoot themselves in their own head.

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

50/50 for panic/victory or 100% for victim status? I'll take 50/50 thanks-I respect guns not fear them.

Do you respect or fear the imaginary gun of your imaginary "boogey-man"? — the only challenge you're likely to "win".

so criminals with guns are now imaginary "boogey-men"?

How many real criminals with guns have you encountered? How many have you just imagined are a threat?

no house fire either but I still prep my family-you’re out of arguments and reaching in the bowels now lol

One can escape from most house fires, but not from the wild firing of bullets.

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

Imaginary "boogey-men" aren't real. You don't need guns to protect yourself from imaginary "boogey-men".

you seem to believe evil can simply be outlawed. What would u suggest a woman do 2 fight off a strong male attacking with a knife?

Does she already have a loaded gun in her hand? Probably not. And the "strong male" won't let her get to it before he does.

women defend themselves all the time in such a scenario. + the mere possibility that a target might be armed is a deterrent.

The "strong male with the knife" wasn't deterred in your scenario. Since you made up the scenario, give her a suit of armor.

that scenario was yours, where no one has guns, thus, no deterrence. R u going to continue playing semantics or face the truth?

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

what do you do to defend yourself?

We should defend ourselves by taking reasonable precautions—not by amassing arsenals of deadly weapons.

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

what do you do to defend yourself?

Against what? I don't need any defense against imaginary armed attackers that never materialize.

oh, so now you want them imaginary? Enjoy living in your fake fantasy world.

Forget about imagined boogey-men trying to assault you. If a real person does, he's not a "boogey-man".

just remember, you're the one that brought up your imaginary boogey men, not me.

I don't waste time and money shooting at paper "boogey-man" targets who can't shoot back.

but when cops do it, it's called training, right? You're just grasping at straws here.

No. The cops are shooting at "straw men". That's why they sometimes panic and shoot unarmed "suspects".

•     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •     •

sub-titles . . .

Is It True That “All Scripture Is Inspired By GOD”?

What Is “the Bible”?

The First Christian Church was Jewish

The Septuagint—Bible of the Writers of the New Testament

There Were No Jots or Tittles in the Original Hebrew Scriptures

Moses Appears in the Promised Land

Critical Mess—Inspecting the Sceptic “Think” Tank

Many Copies of the Law, The Prophets, and The Writings Have Been Destroyed

GOD Doesn’t Care If Anybody Reads the Scriptures

The Early Christians Never Read the New Testament

Diagnosing Textual Dysfunction

The Lord Changes Not—Until He Does—or is Required To

Only Believe—Even if you Don’t Know What you are “Believing”

Become a Claims Examiner

What Was Paul Actually Saying in 2Timothy 3:16?

Does “All Scripture” Mean Every Scripture?

Endless Genealogies and Endless Arguments

The Lord, YAHshua Deliberately Limited His Public “Outreach”

Outer Limits

Modern Revelations From Science

Revelation Before the Beginning of the End-Time

The First Postponement of the End-Time

Time Flies Whether You’re Having Fun or Not

Heaven and Earth Shall Pass Away, But My Words Shall Not Pass Away

The Second Postponement of the End-Time

Preparing for the Next 2,000 Years

Fleeing the Wrath to Come

Luke’s Central Role In the Creation of the New Testament

What Happened to the Apostles and Elders?

The Apostle John Completes the New Testament Canon of Christian Scripture

Gold Mining

The First Christians Knew Nothing About the New Testament—or What Would Eventually Be In It.

Was Paul the Only One Who Fully Understood His Epistles?

What is Holy about the Words and Writings of Humans with Un-Godly Attitudes?

You Have Not Denied My Name

Should God Be Talking Like This?        

Is It God’s Inspired Recipe for the Most Nutritious Line of Bread Products and Breakfast Cereals Ever Sold? —or a Recipe for a “Sh*t Sandwich”!

But Back to that Ezekiel 4:9 Recipe

Common Misconceptions About Being “Born Again”

Is the Kingdom of God “Within You”?

Before Me, There Was No God Formed

The Connection Between Gunolatry and Idolatry

John—The Apostle of Love

Hidden Passages

Explore the new scripture reference resource now available. Click the underlined Recommended Books and discover “hidden passages” throughout the Bible that most theologians have missed.

Stay thirsty for “new wine”

Two thousand years ago, the oldest scriptural revelation (“old wine”) was considered better by many than the new revelation (“new wine”) brought by Jesus Christ. The Jewish theological authorities of that day preferred to continue “stupefying” themselves with the easily manipulated vagaries of traditional Hebrew scripture because it enabled them to manipulate those who felt obligated to obey them.

But Jesus, or YAHshua was given power by GOD to provide “new wine” which was far better than the old, because it can enlighten those who are “thirsty” enough to try it.

Stay “thirsty”, my friends, for the “water” that becomes “new wine” for those willing to accept new revelation.

A look ahead . . .

I like to think my website presents "New predictive insights into religion and politics—ancient, "modern", and future— written as "serious satire" that entertains as it educates. You've never read anything like this— anywhere!"— as I humbly state on the New Xrayzr Revelations page. My stuff actually is predictive, and those of you who keep an eye on U.S. news may be aware of that.

Please read the Presentation: On the Wrong Side of the Tracts— why Christian mini-leaflets fail to reveal "the Way, the Truth, and the Life". It takes more than a half-dozen scriptures to fully explain Messianic Christian theology— even though, perhaps, it only takes a handful of scriptures to "fully" explain "Sunday School theology". Apparently, many children— and adults— have very short attention spans. 

Also, now available on the New Xrayzr Revelations page, is an intriguing overview of the current controversies surrounding "Gay" Marriage and the many diverse "Biblical" definitions and arrangements of Marriage. The Presentation is titled Holy Acrimony!

In the mean time, I'm working on a treatise refuting the obviously illogical and mythical theories of "mutationism"— also known as "evolution" . . .

Which Came First— the Dinosaur, or the Egg?

This book will also include discussions of atheistic "no-god-required" substitutes for GOD, which most "scientific" atheists believe self-produced our "known Universe" from absolutely nothing. Ironically, a few well-known atheistic cosmology theorists claim there can be an unknowable number of "multi-verses" filled with undetectable dark energy, dark matter, and black holes.

(Don't be alarmed. What poses as "Young Earth Creationism" is mostly bogus also.) 

Thank you for your continuing interest.